Circular Cross-Scalar Governance Spiral
Luthe, Tobias and Fitzpatrick, Haley (2023) Circular Cross-Scalar Governance Spiral. In: Proceedings of Relating Systems Thinking and Design Volume: RSD12, 06-20 Oct 2023.
Preview |
Text
Cross-scale-governance-spiral-June-2023.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. Download (134kB) | Preview |
Abstract
For operationalising design for regeneration, we need to take decisions across scales of governance and space and adopt practices of continuously zooming in on details and then zooming out to see the bigger picture, which are processes in dynamic relation. The poster offers a spiral approach to relating circularities on eight nested spatial and governance scales, from green chemistry to transnational cooperation (Luthe, Fitzpatrick & Wahl, 2020). Planning and design decisions on one scale have a direct or indirect impact on all scales; thus, governance must better evaluate cross-scalar systemic effects. This conceptual framework is partly based on Wahl (2006) and is here presented in the form of a novel contribution to designing resilient regenerative systems. The mathematical foundation is the Fibonacci spiral: a common functional pattern occurring throughout nature, it provides an analogy for better communicating the scalar processes of designing and governing resilient regenerative systems (Drozdyuk and Drozdyuk, 2010; Bistagnino, 2018).
A widely supported goal is to transform our economies and societies as interconnected systems with locally adapted solutions corresponding to global dynamics. This cross-scale governance approach applies the design of resilient regenerative systems to deal with “wicked problems”, such as how evidence-based solutions are rarely directly translated into decision-making. The inherent complexities in such problem-solving require incubating more effective transformational action (Elzen & Wieczorek, 2005; Wahl & Baxtor, 2008).
Generating clear visualisation strategies is critical to communicate and encouraging evolving debates on the regenerative design of resource production and distribution (Fazey et al., 2020). Building upon published work (Wahl, 2016), the model offers a spiral approach to relating nested spatial and governance scales, from green chemistry to transnationalities, with their inherent circularities, identifies planning and design decisions that have direct or indirect impacts on all scales; thus, governance must better evaluate these cross-scalar systemic effects (Wahl, 2006).
| Item Type: | Conference/Workshop Item (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | regeneration, cross-scale, circularities, bio-regional scale, transition design, graphical framework, Fibonacci |
| Divisions: | Faculty of Design |
| Date Deposited: | 12 Mar 2026 16:35 |
| Last Modified: | 12 Mar 2026 16:45 |
| URI: | https://openresearch.ocadu.ca/id/eprint/4947 |
Actions (login required)
![]() |
Edit View |

Lists
Lists