This thesis examines the problems with Equity, Diversity and Inclusion (EDI) in Canadian art institutions and how Grounded Normative Theory (GNT) offers a better methodology for a healthier, relational system.

Canadian art institutions remain entrenched in behaviourism. It is a method that focuses on external rather than internal mental states. It assumes that consequences shape actions. It seeks to replace negative behaviours with positive ones while neglecting to address their root causes. Our art institutions are built on this neglect of historical harms in Canada that continue to impact marginalized groups at present. Our institutions cannot uphold EDI because settler pushback in this case wealthy donors and fluctuating values is inevitable. Instead, the framework becomes a performative placeholder for change, to assuage unthinking settlers that ‘good change’ is happening. EDI can educate settler institutions on structural violence, but it cannot undo their unwillingness to face their internal racism.

Grounded Normative Theory (GNT) is better suited within the art institution. It embodies ethics, knowledge systems, and practices that honour the needs of different groups. It consists of four overlapping commitments: comprehensiveness, recursivity, attentiveness, and accountability, which reinforce and supplement one another. Thus, GNT’s deconstruction of harmful norms within art institutions fosters healthier internal relationships. This ensures that fair policies and structural change are always rooted in ethics.