OCAD University Open Research Repository

Hearth, Home and Well-being

Beniwal, Sucharita and Naidu, Swagata (2020) Hearth, Home and Well-being. In: Proceedings of Relating Systems Thinking and Design (RSD9) 2020 Symposium., 9-17 Oct 2020, Ahmedabad, India.

[img]
Preview
Text
Beniwal_Hearth_RSD9_2020.pdf
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (65kB) | Preview
Official URL: https://rsdsymposium.org/

Abstract

Interrelating belief systems, built environments and well-being

Humans have always subconsciously known that wellbeing is connected to where we live. Dwellings have deliberately been designed to protect from the elements as well as other lifeforms. Spaces define behaviours and wellbeing. Today, there is a greater understanding of home as a sustainable environment and its connection with wellness. (Janahi, 2018). Therefore it is important to design homes well. However in designing and making a built space a lot of factors come into play, economics, social structure, affordability, the physicality of resources available. These may be called the visible factors, simultaneously, there are invisible social structures that can markedly determine behaviour (Vink, 2019) and decision-making. These invisible social structures include belief systems, identity constructs are often responsible for how spaces are constructed. All these together form complex structures, often difficult to capture and visualise. A systems mapping helps recognize the often elusive problematic nodes and their interconnections; as well as develop a holistic understanding of the often hard to grasp and define root causes (Seveldson, 2019). Most importantly, systemic design visualisation and analysis empowers one to determine the most opportune leverage point to make potential interventions (Meadows, 2008).

The workshop facilitators hypothesize that these invisible structures shape decisions for the built environment and the activities that take place in those spaces. Through mapping personal identity and our dwelling spaces in a workshop mode, these invisible structures and their deterministic outcome can be visualised. It can be seen that if the home “a safe haven” in uncertain times is it truly safe for all of its occupants? Therefore making the participants more aware of their critical positionality and decisions. The authors argue that while the home and domestic is often understood as private however the behaviours enacted in these spaces are shaped by larger contexts. Aligning to the current ‘black lives matter’ movement, one sees that systemic violence is embedded into our social structures and is normalised in behaviours, and therefore translated continually into our designs, designed spaces, and environments. Through the use of “emergent tools” participants will be encouraged to reveal these invisible social structures and their multi-layered connectedness to pave the way for intervention models (Seveldson, 2019). Awareness of the often unspoken hierarchy and unwritten rules can be a powerful enabler to bring about a conscious change in the system.

This workshop aims to make tangible for a heterogeneous group of participants from varied locations an opportunity to discover –

How our belief systems and identity shape our spaces?
How these spaces, in turn, affect our behaviour and construct our wellbeing?
If these spaces are not conducive to the wellbeing of all the occupants, how then should we be designing our spaces?
What and where should be the change – Spaces? – Behaviour responses? – Belief systems?

It is hoped the participants will engage in dialogue on how can such change be brought about.

Item Type: Conference/Workshop Item (Other)
Divisions: Faculty of Design
Date Deposited: 04 May 2022 20:48
Last Modified: 04 May 2022 21:00
URI: http://openresearch.ocadu.ca/id/eprint/3621

Actions (login required)

Edit View Edit View